The Evaluation and Redesign of eDeploy
Online Learning Modules

View Master's Project
Note: The actual artifact will open in a new window.

Problem Statement
In 1999 eDeploy, Inc. created an extensive set of online learning modules for their software. The learners are to complete these modules prior to attending an instructor-led training session, however 90% of the learners were not completing the tutorials. Aside from the time, money and effort put forth by the design and development team for these modules, there were other impacts on eDeploy from the lack of online tutorial completion. The online modules are a prerequisite for an advanced instructor-led hands-on workshop. Without the learners previously completing the introductory information online, the instructor must back track and review the information provided in the online learning modules. This additional information increases the amount of face-to-face training time and oftentimes the advanced content has to be overlooked due to time constraints. The eDeploy audience is varied in technical ability, job function and largely geographically dispersed, which was the initial reasoning for developing the online learning modules. My role with eDeploy, Inc. was to evaluate the existing online learning modules, determine the reasons for the extremely high number of learners that are abandoning these tutorials and redesign the online learning curriculum to increase learner usage and information retention.

top

Situation Analysis
This project spanned seven months. My initial assignment with eDeploy was to evaluate the second release of the eLearning modules and assist the beta test team in obtaining quality results. The evaluation revealed that only 10% of the learners were actually passing the course, the other 90% were not failing, but were not completing the course. The end result was a complete redesign of the eLearning suite including identifying a new Learning Management System (LMS).

This project includes 4 main parts:

  • The evaluation of the existing eDeploy eLearning modules
  • The redesign of the eDeploy eLearning modules
  • Selecting and implementing a Learning Management System
  • The development of the eDeploy eLearning modules

Top

Rationale
The main goal in the redesign of the eLearning modules was to increase the learner usage and learner retention, reducing the amount of overview content review in the face-to-face advance workshop. Learner completion of the online modules would also reduce the amount of overall helpdesk calls for simple issues covered in the eLearning content. As the audience is varied, the eLearning modules needed to accommodate a wide range of technical ability as well as meet the needs of each job role as defined within the eDeploy user population.

The Web is the primary medium for the eDeploy application, thus the learning medium was decidedly web-based prior to my arrival. eDeploy also had very high technical restrictions that the evaluation and redesign of the online learning did not need to worry about technical needs. eDeploy supported Internet Explorer 4.0 and above only, and the software application was designed for 800x600 resolution. There are 5000+ eDeploy users worldwide, thus the eLearning audience is large in number and extremely geographically dispersed, which only solidified the use of the Web as the training delivery media.

eDeploy is a process-based software. There is no definite procedure as far as configuring the software to meet the needs of the customer, and most often than not there are two ways to complete each task. The primary goal with the initial eLearning modules is navigation and where to locate task information. The second goal is to ensure the learners are able to use the software according to their needs. Since this is software application training, the simple strategy of Rule, Example, Practice will be used. Simulation and visual representation of the material is key for this strategy to work, and is discussed in greater detail in later sections. As stated earlier, there are several ways to perform each task in eDeploy. Each eDeploy customer defines the practice of these tasks; therefore the eLearning suite must be flexible. The online learning strategy is to remain learner controlled, with a linear progression available, but not necessary.

Top

Results Report
eDeploy Inc. suffered through three layoffs in the spring of 2001 before finally closing its doors. The training department was let go in the final layoff before the company went defunct. During the initial layoffs the software went back into a development phase, however employees in the customer service areas were retained to support the existing software. The development of the entire suite of eLearning modules was never completed. Only one full example exists, and that is of the overview module. This entire eLearning redesign and development was never rolled out to the end user population and thus no formative or summative evaluation could be conducted. The eDeploy eLearning Module 1 is an introductory module covering logon, navigation and content and directory structure.

Top

Evidence of Value
Although the end eLearning product was never realized, the project itself was indeed valuable. I was able to take a project from start to finish through all design phases, I just happened to start the design cycle with evaluation and progress from there. I was also able to review, evaluate and implement a Learning Management System, which could have been a project in itself.

I feel that if eDeploy, Inc. were still in business we would have achieved success with the redesigned eLearning modules. The customers were behind us and willing to help out and evaluate our new modules. It is truly a shame, but a sign of the times that eDeploy went out of business.

Top

Reflections
This project spanned seven months. My initial assignment was to evaluate the second release of the eLearning modules and assist the beta test team in obtaining quality results. The beta test team was well into the quality assurance phase and did not like my prodding around in their hard design and development work. The valuation revealed that only 10% of the learners were actually passing the course, the other 90% were not failing, they were not even completing the course. The end result was a complete redesign of the eLearning suite including a new LMS. I couldn't have asked for a better project for my Master's Project. I ended up choosing this project in particular because it derived from a real-world work project. I was able to collaborate with colleagues, eDeploy employees and customers on the design and development. Until the time came to finally compile all the project information, did I realize that I could have had 4 separate projects. However, I felt that showcasing my work in this way demonstrates my ability as an instructional designer.

Top

Responsibilities Met
Responsibility #2- Designs instruction or human performance strategy to meet the needs of learners. The eDeploy online learning module was designed to meet the needs of a dispersed audience. The online learning was designed to be used as a training tool first and reference later, therefore it is very learner controlled and learner centered.

Responsibility #3-Uses a variety of media to deliver instruction to students and to engage student in learning. The online setting for this tutorial is appropriate for the diverse audience targeted, and the variety of instructional strategies and activities used within the tutorial strive to engage the learner.

Responsibility #4-Understands how to capitalize on the capacities and abilities of each learner. The online learning was ultimately destined for a wide audience. With that in mind, supplemental face-to-face courses and downloadable job aids and software simulation (demonstration) was developed.

Responsibility #5-Manages complex projects and resources in support of learning. I wore two hats on this project, one of project manager and the other of instructional designer. Through the course of this project I coordinated the selection and implementation of a Learning Management System and managed technical writers in the development of the online modules, while remaining the key instructional designer.

Responsibility #6-Uses incisive and relevant assessment and evaluation techniques. The start of this project is actually an evaluation of the prior online learning modules. I was able to access multiple sources for data gathering and review both qualitative and quantitative data. As far as evaluation and assessment in the online tutorial, there are both hands-on exercises and multiple-choice quizzes to test the learner throughout the course of the modules.

Top